Grading for equity : what it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms
(eBook)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Published
Thousand Oaks, California : Corwin, a SAGE Company, [2019].
Format
eBook
ISBN
9781506391588, 1506391583, 9781506391601, 1506391605
Physical Desc
1 online resource (xxviii, 266 pages) : illustrations (chiefly color)
Status

Staff View

Grouped Work ID
4e1afc72-6e20-b61c-7a27-e6140bf2f5d5-eng
Go To Grouped Work

Grouping Information

Grouped Work ID4e1afc72-6e20-b61c-7a27-e6140bf2f5d5-eng
Full titlegrading for equity what it is why it matters and how it can transform schools and classrooms
Authorfeldman joe
Grouping Categorybook
Last Update2024-01-08 09:01:20AM
Last Indexed2024-06-16 15:11:45PM

Book Cover Information

Image Sourcedefault
First LoadedApr 23, 2024
Last UsedApr 23, 2024

Marc Record

First DetectedJun 05, 2023 10:08:12 AM
Last File Modification TimeJan 08, 2024 09:44:10 AM

MARC Record

LEADER07423cam a2200769 i 4500
001on1053991774
003OCoLC
00520231218213021.0
006m        d        
007cr |n|||||||||
008180910t20192019caua    ob    001 0 eng d
015 |a GBB8H6649|2 bnb
0167 |a 019063248|2 Uk
019 |a 1173996906|a 1175920819
020 |a 9781506391588|q (electronic book)
020 |a 1506391583|q (electronic book)
020 |a 9781506391601|q (PDF)
020 |a 1506391605|q (PDF)
020 |z 9781506391571|q (paperback ;|q alkaline paper)
020 |z 1506391575|q (paperback ;|q alkaline paper)
020 |z 9781506391595
035 |a 2524696|b (N$T)
035 |a (OCoLC)1053991774|z (OCoLC)1173996906|z (OCoLC)1175920819
037 |a 9781506391601|b Ingram Content Group
037 |a 1CB775E8-F2C6-4704-A894-B6B5DEA3BDE7|b OverDrive, Inc.|n http://www.overdrive.com
040 |a NLE|b eng|e pn|e rda|c NLE|d UKMGB|d OCLCO|d OCLCF|d TEFOD|d OCLCQ|d N$T|d WAU|d YDX|d IAK|d KMS|d EBLCP|d CUF|d OCLCO|d GGVRL|d ORE|d CTU|d UKAHL|d CGN|d IAI|d OCLCO|d COM|d OCLCA|d OCLCQ|d OCLCO|d OCLCL|d OCLCQ
043 |a n-us---
046 |k 2019|2 edtf
049 |a MAIN
050 4|a LB3051
08204|a 371.26013|2 23
1001 |a Feldman, Joe,|e author.
24510|a Grading for equity :|b what it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms /|c Joe Feldman.
264 1|a Thousand Oaks, California :|b Corwin, a SAGE Company,|c [2019]
264 4|c ©2019
300 |a 1 online resource (xxviii, 266 pages) :|b illustrations (chiefly color)
336 |a text|b txt|2 rdacontent
337 |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia
338 |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 247-255) and index.
5050 |a Prologue: Mallory's dilemma -- Foundations. What makes grading so difficult to talk about (and even harder to change)? ; A brief history of grading -- The case for change : how traditional grading thwarts effective and equitable teaching and learning. How traditional grading stifles risk-taking and supports the "commodity of grades" ; Traditional grading hides information, invites biases, and provides misleading information ; Traditional grading demotivates and disempowers ; A new vision of grading -- Equitable grading practices. Practices that are mathematically accurate ; Practices that value knowledge, not environment or behavior ; Practices that support hope and a growth mindset ; Practices that "lift the veil" ; Practices that build "soft skills" without including them in the grade ; Putting it all together : Nick and Cathy -- Epilogue : A return to Mallory's school.
520 |a "For some time, traditional (A - F) grading practices have been under fire from a wide range of stakeholder. Grading policies are wildly inconsistent from classroom to classroom, frequently misguided, uninformed, and frequently based on subjective judgments. Of even more concern, our grading practices exacerbate the achievement gap. It is well-documented that African-American and Latino students, boys, as well as special education students, are disproportionately suspended and expelled, influenced by teachers' unconscious but biased judgments of student behavior. Virtually ignored is how teachers' incorporate subjective and non-academic criteria into their grades (through criteria such as student attitude, 'participation', and 'effort'), and how approach to grading contributes to these same students' disproportionately high course failure rates and disproportionately low placement in advanced academic tracks"--Provided by publisher.
520 |a 'Joe Feldman shows us how we can use grading to help students become the leaders of their own learning and lift the veil on how to succeed.... This must-have book will help teachers learn to implement improved, equity-focused grading for impact.'--Zaretta Hammond, Author of Culturally Responsive Teaching & The Brain Crack open the grading conversation Here at last--and none too soon--is a resource that delivers the research base, tools, and courage to tackle one of the most challenging and emotionally charged conversations in today's schools: our inconsistent grading practices and the ways they can inadvertently perpetuate the achievement and opportunity gaps among our students. With Grading for Equity, Joe Feldman cuts to the core of the conversation, revealing how grading practices that are accurate, bias-resistant, and motivational will improve learning, minimize grade inflation, reduce failure rates, and become a lever for creating stronger teacher-student relationships and more caring classrooms. Essential reading for schoolwide and individual book study or for student advocates, Grading for Equity provides A critical historical backdrop, describing how our inherited system of grading was originally set up as a sorting mechanism to provide or deny opportunity, control students, and endorse a 'fixed mindset' about students' academic potential--practices that are still in place a century later A summary of the research on motivation and equitable teaching and learning, establishing a rock-solid foundation and a 'true north' orientation toward equitable grading practices Specific grading practices that are more equitable, along with teacher examples, strategies to solve common hiccups and concerns, and evidence of effectiveness Reflection tools for facilitating individual or group engagement and understanding As Joe writes, 'Grading practices are a mirror not just for students, but for us as their teachers.' Each one of us should start by asking, 'What do my grading practices say about who I am and what I believe?' Then, let's make the choice to do things differently... with Grading for Equity as a dog-eared reference.
5880 |a Description based on print version record.
590 |a Added to collection customer.56279.3
650 0|a Grading and marking (Students)|z United States.
650 0|a Discrimination in education|z United States.
650 0|a Minority students|x Rating of|z United States.
650 0|a Educational equalization|z United States.
650 6|a Classement et notation (Élèves et étudiants)|z États-Unis.
650 6|a Discrimination en éducation|z États-Unis.
650 6|a Démocratisation de l'enseignement|z États-Unis.
650 7|a Discrimination in education|2 fast
650 7|a Educational equalization|2 fast
650 7|a Grading and marking (Students)|2 fast
650 7|a Minority students|x Rating of|2 fast
651 7|a United States|2 fast|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq
77608|i Print version:|a Feldman, Joe.|t Grading for equity.|d Thousand Oaks, California : Corwin, a SAGE Company, [2019]|z 1506391575|w (DLC) 2018021314|w (OCoLC)1037296983
85640|3 EBSCOhost|u https://emil.mlc-wels.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2524696
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services|b ASKH|n AH39686730
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services|b ASKH|n AH34856542
938 |a Askews and Holts Library Services|b ASKH|n AH35693372
938 |a Gale Cengage Learning|b GVRL|n GVRL59VP
938 |a YBP Library Services|b YANK|n 301382852
938 |a EBSCOhost|b EBSC|n 2524696
938 |a YBP Library Services|b YANK|n 16844589
994 |a 92|b N$T

Description

Loading Description...

More Details

Language
English

Notes

Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 247-255) and index.
Description
"For some time, traditional (A - F) grading practices have been under fire from a wide range of stakeholder. Grading policies are wildly inconsistent from classroom to classroom, frequently misguided, uninformed, and frequently based on subjective judgments. Of even more concern, our grading practices exacerbate the achievement gap. It is well-documented that African-American and Latino students, boys, as well as special education students, are disproportionately suspended and expelled, influenced by teachers' unconscious but biased judgments of student behavior. Virtually ignored is how teachers' incorporate subjective and non-academic criteria into their grades (through criteria such as student attitude, 'participation', and 'effort'), and how approach to grading contributes to these same students' disproportionately high course failure rates and disproportionately low placement in advanced academic tracks"--Provided by publisher.
Description
'Joe Feldman shows us how we can use grading to help students become the leaders of their own learning and lift the veil on how to succeed.... This must-have book will help teachers learn to implement improved, equity-focused grading for impact.'--Zaretta Hammond, Author of Culturally Responsive Teaching & The Brain Crack open the grading conversation Here at last--and none too soon--is a resource that delivers the research base, tools, and courage to tackle one of the most challenging and emotionally charged conversations in today's schools: our inconsistent grading practices and the ways they can inadvertently perpetuate the achievement and opportunity gaps among our students. With Grading for Equity, Joe Feldman cuts to the core of the conversation, revealing how grading practices that are accurate, bias-resistant, and motivational will improve learning, minimize grade inflation, reduce failure rates, and become a lever for creating stronger teacher-student relationships and more caring classrooms. Essential reading for schoolwide and individual book study or for student advocates, Grading for Equity provides A critical historical backdrop, describing how our inherited system of grading was originally set up as a sorting mechanism to provide or deny opportunity, control students, and endorse a 'fixed mindset' about students' academic potential--practices that are still in place a century later A summary of the research on motivation and equitable teaching and learning, establishing a rock-solid foundation and a 'true north' orientation toward equitable grading practices Specific grading practices that are more equitable, along with teacher examples, strategies to solve common hiccups and concerns, and evidence of effectiveness Reflection tools for facilitating individual or group engagement and understanding As Joe writes, 'Grading practices are a mirror not just for students, but for us as their teachers.' Each one of us should start by asking, 'What do my grading practices say about who I am and what I believe?' Then, let's make the choice to do things differently... with Grading for Equity as a dog-eared reference.
Local note
Added to collection customer.56279.3

Reviews from GoodReads

Loading GoodReads Reviews.

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Feldman, J. (2019). Grading for equity: what it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms . Corwin, a SAGE Company.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Feldman, Joe. 2019. Grading for Equity: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How It Can Transform Schools and Classrooms. Corwin, a SAGE Company.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Feldman, Joe. Grading for Equity: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How It Can Transform Schools and Classrooms Corwin, a SAGE Company, 2019.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Feldman, Joe. Grading for Equity: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How It Can Transform Schools and Classrooms Corwin, a SAGE Company, 2019.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.